Seniority-Based Layoffs Will Exacerbate Job Loss in Public Education
February 2009
Marguerite Roza
Download Full Report (PDF: 319 K)
K-12 school districts that lay off personnel according to seniority cause disproportionate damage to their programs and students than if layoffs were determined on a seniority-neutral basis.
School districts face severe budget challenges with state funding at risk in this perilous economy. In this four-page analysis of K-12 district layoff issues, Marguerite Roza, a senior scholar at the Center on Reinventing Public Education, calculates that if a district is required to use layoffs to cut its budget by 10 percent and cuts the most junior employees, it will need to axe 14.3 percent of its workforce (including teachers) to meet the 10 percent budget reduction.
On the other hand, if that district followed a seniority-neutral layoff policy—say by a standard of employee effectiveness—only 10 percent of the workforce would lose their jobs.
Nationwide, if all districts followed a seniority-neutral layoff policy to save 10 percent, 612,256 jobs would be lost compared with 874,623 lost under a seniority-based policy.
This Rapid Response analysis is the first in the "Schools in Crisis: Making Ends Meet" series.
Related Publications
Have States Disproportionately Cut Education Budgets During ARRA? Early Findings
The Tradeoff Between Teacher Wages and Layoffs to Meet Budget Cuts
Separation of Degrees: State-By-State Analysis of Teacher Compensation for Master’s Degrees
Ranking the States: Federal Education Stimulus Money and the Prospects for Reform
Projections of State Budget Shortfalls on K-12 Public Education Spending and Job Loss
Related News
04/2009
Can Budget Cuts Catalyze Education Reform? Roza Event Airs on C-SPAN
02/2009
K-12 schools: Seniority-neutral layoff policy would save jobs
Context
Related Topics: Finance & Productivity
Related Projects: Finance, Spending, and Productivity Project
Related Initiatives: Schools in Crisis: Making Ends Meet

